By stressing that reviews should focus on informing decisions rather than halting projects, the justices—liberal and conservative alike—signaled a major shift toward faster approvals and broader agency discretion. The case centered on whether regulators had to consider downstream effects like oil refining tied to the railway. Environmental groups argued yes, but the Court sided with a narrower scope of review,...
Related Posts
Golden Bride Behind Closed Doors
A village girl in a palace of glass, a man with a last name heavy enough to bend the air. Millions watched, judged, dissected. Overnight, Soudi became…
Iconic Steak Restaurant Chain Shuts Nationwide
The beloved American steakhouse chain shocked many when it suddenly closed all 261 of its corporate-owned locations and laid off nearly 18,000 employees. The closures came after…
The Threshold of Escalation: Global Reactions to the 2026 Strikes on Iranian Nuclear Facilities
The first explosions were never seen on television. They ripped through the darkness beneath a mountain, in a place most people will never visit, aimed at a…
20 Minutes ago in California, Nancy Pelosi was confirmed as…See more
The room went silent before the applause. In a single vote, California Democrats didn’t just back Nancy Pelosi — they doubled down on a political era many…
Pete Hegseth Hospitalized in Critical Condition… See more
In a move that left fans, colleagues, and even political critics speechless, Fox News host Pete Hegseth shocked the nation with an announcement few saw coming. Known…
My husband texted me from Vegas saying he’d just married his coworker and called me pathetic, I replied “Cool,” canceled his cards, changed the house locks, and the next morning the police were at my door…
My name is Clara Jensen. I’m thirty-four, and a year ago I would have laughed if someone told me my marriage would end before I even realized…